Terrorism In V For Vendetta Essay

Terrorism In V For Vendetta Essay Terrorism In V For Vendetta Essay Terrorism in V for Vendetta Modern-day terrorism presents a global threat to peace. With the terrorist attacks in 2001 and various attacks in Europe, a clear stereotype of what a terrorist is has emerged. When I think of terrorists, I imagine Muslim extremists with homemade bombs. The graphic novel V for Vendetta examines terrorism and what is traditionally referenced when one thinks of terrorism. V for Vendetta brings up some questions about what is the definition of a terrorist and how does the definition change based on people's different perspectives. From the perspective of the people, the Norsefire government is considered a terrorist group but because the people elected the government they are terrorists by association. When identifying a terrorist certain variables should be considered, such as the points of view of the labeler and the sources of the definition of the word 'terrorist.' In labeling a group or person as terrorist, one’s definition of terrorism should be considered. Often times it is the government's job to set the definition of terrorism because governments are often targeted by terrorist groups. Another aspect to consider is the perspective of the labeler. When the people are actively involved in government, the government's perspective on who is a terrorist will be similar with the people's perspective. In the graphic novel V for Vendetta the people could not be less involved in their government. Therefore, later in the novel the government and the people have different perspectives about who is a terrorist. For instance, Norsefire considers the individual codenamed â€Å"V† a terrorist for various bombings and killings. Through the government’s influence by defining V’s acts as terrorism, the people also considered V a terrorist at first. Later in the novel, the people regard their government as a terrorist organization for the Larkhill experiments where they experimented on the minorities and homosexuals until death. The general mistreatment of the people is another factor that lead to such a distaste for Norsefire. In the novel V for Vendetta the controlling government, Norsefire, takes away the public’s freedoms and has them constantly under surveillance. Because of these injustices against the people, one could consider Norsefire to be a terrorist organization. Through claims of betterment the government takes away freedoms, such as privacy, without the people ever questioning or realizing the loss of these rights. For example, there are cameras that claim to be for protection. A camera cannot protect anyone but it can take away the right to privacy. â€Å"†¦the Brixton and Streatham areas are quarantine zones as of today. It is suggested that these areas be avoided for reasons of health and safety.†(p.9). This is another example of loss of rights without question. With a g overnment as controlling as Norsefire, it is not hard to believe that a government could be a terrorist group. With Norsefire being a people elected government, the people are to blame for their government’s actions. The people in V for Vendetta are terrorists to themselves or at the very least accomplices to terrorists. By becoming content

Essay on Morality and Ethics in Corporate World (Sample)

Essay on Morality and Ethics in Corporate World (Sample) Essay on Morality and Ethics in Corporate World In the corporate world, there is a large group of people who are hired to perform their skills and responsibilities as employees and investors. There are rules and policies that are indicated from the contract that has been drafted and applied by the corporate world in order to ensure that the quality of ethical responsibilities is followed. Discipline is important in the corporate world because it values the trust and the dignity of every employee to ensure that their services and product campaign are essential to value the cooperation of the target markets. In this case, it enhances the credibility of each employee to essential render their service efficiently and accurately to prevent any conflicting interests that might challenge the productivity of the corporate world. The principle of morality in the corporate world is valued by the influence of a firm leadership application; it is valued by managers and a head of a company. The reason behind is that leaders have the authority to apply their styles towards their employees to prevent any risks or hazards caused by ineffective skill management to a certain function or operation. During training, moral values are always insinuated by the training officers of the company because every employee should be responsible with their actions when rendering their service to the operating institution. As a result, the influence of an effective management procedure enhances the credibility of the institution to improve its values and trust with their target markets to establish an efficient way of promoting their professionalism. In the corporate world, the value of personal and professional ethics plays an important role to promote the essentials of morality towards other stakeholders. A productive corporate world is sustained by an effective and aggressive leader by leading change to the stakeholders to move in an upward trend, indicating an improvement with the assets and investments of the company. It is a strategic campaign to bolster the fundamentals of the company’s marketing values and interest. The result of having an effective leadership moves the company forward by means of generating an increased revenue status that improves credibility in the corporate world. This means that having an effective leadership generates a positive change within the corporate structure of the company. Respecting the house rules as well as the provisions provided by either national or international regulating agencies engages in a harmonious corporate structure to protect and safeguard that interest of the public. The ethical consideration of the corporate world is adapting to diversity applicable towards employees and consumers. In the corporate world, basic human rights are always waived to all stakeholders because it values the integrity of every human being while transacting and rendering the services of the institution. This involves respecting the race, the gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, social class, educational attainment, and age. In this case, the corporate world values the integrity of every individual by means of preventing actions against racism, hate speech, and discrimination of any actions made by its employees or a company. Respecting the rights of anyone is a major goal of the corporate world to sustain and implement its morality and ethical values. At the end of the day, a company influences the interest as well as productivity by means of engaging in a humane way of operating the company to both local and international markets (Churchland, 2011). Reference Churchland, Patricia Smith (2011).  Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton University Press. pp.  7–9.  ISBN  978-0-691-13703-2.